- cecilkorik@piefed.caEnglish10 days
Yes of course, it is what we are best at. The Torment Nexus was just the fictional fever dream of a deranged madman, until we turned our efforts towards it started building them on every street corner, and now they are just part of everyday life. I heard they got the idea from some fascinating book by a brilliant visionary, titled “Don’t create the Torment Nexus”.
- shirro@aussie.zoneEnglish12 days
Sounds like a bullshit headline but it is an eternal truth that the owners of capital demand slave labour. Take the work houses away and they demand chattel slavery. Take the chattel slaves away and they want convict labour. Take the convict labour away and they want undocumented foreigners to exploit. Take that away and they casualise work and pay people in tips or commissions. Take that away and they export work to countries that will do all the things they can’t do at home.
The investment in LLMs is purely a scam at this point but much of the initial enthusiasm was driven by the disdain for labour. Highly skilled labour like engineers keep arguing with the MBAs that their cost cutting is going to kill people or destroy the company and that really upsets them and risks the bonuses and share buyback program.
While the drudgery of work isn’t great, I would much prefer the capital class invested in R&D and equipment to make their skilled, specialized workers more productive and improved our remuneration and conditions as happened in previous generations before the MBA apocalypse. Instead they are trying to cut us out. Too many people are living paycheck to paycheck and unable to afford housing as wealth inequality escalates.
Mistreatment of animals or brain cells in a box isn’t the same as putting a child to work in a mine but the mindset that drives us in this direction is.
Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
11 daysEngineers may argue that cost cutting will doom a given company yet will refuse to unionize and take a stand for the most part. It’s maddening.
- QuandaleDingle@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
You told it like it is. Well said. Now I’m yet more afraid of our future.
Semperverus@lemmy.worldEnglish
12 daysIf a revolution starts, the MBAs should be second in line to the gallows.
fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.comEnglish
11 daysThe main problem is that shareholders can sue a company to force decisions but workers and customers cant.
TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.worldEnglish
12 daysAnd, the billionaires asked scientists, “Can we just get the brain? Brains don’t have any rights, do they?”
- Optional@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
People, people. This is WIRED.
This is what they do.
- “Here Come the Zippies”

- 12 days
Kind of? But not really. Maybe? Here’s a wired article on the idea. You be the judge
https://www.wired.com/1994/05/zippies/
It’s all very poorly defined, imo
- 12 days
Next step, servitors. About 30 thousands years ahead of schedule.
- 12 days
And I bet right-wing
profiteerspastors would have nothing bad to say about human-machine hybrids that can’t technically be slaves because they don’t have souls. joelfromaus@aussie.zoneEnglish
12 daysI was just watching a thing about the Adeptus Mechanicus and their “computers”. Even the full robots still use a wafer of human brain as the processor so that no AI is used.
It’s sounding more and more like a prediction than a warning.
- KeenFlame@feddit.nuEnglish11 days
Yeah because there is no way it is a fictional story that sparks imagination
- aim4harmony@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
What’s the point with this artifial intelligence race anyways? Why is there a sudden need for that after all?
I understand that AI as a tool can be useful for some tasks, but do we really need to go further than that?
- 12 days
I think it’s a combination of things. One, they are good at synthesizing huge amounts of data and detecting trends, which is useful for surveillance if you’re not that hung up on being exactly right all the time. Two, they are very energy-costly, so their use drives up the price of energy, which drives up the price of fossil fuels.
- Telorand@reddthat.comEnglish12 days
What’s the point with this artifial intelligence race anyways?
Free labor. Humans are expensive, but robot slaves are comparatively cheap (hypothetically).
Ultracapitalists have a harder time getting a slave labor force, so robots that can think like people are the next best thing for that purpose.
- SinningStromgald@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
And if there is a “free” labor force competing with humans for jobs then humans will be forced to accept lower pay, longer hours, and less benifits for more work.
- 12 days
And eventually, labor bargains will be obsolete. They won’t need us ever again. Top 1% live in utopia, rest of us living in slums
Almacca@aussie.zoneEnglish
12 daysIt’s not free by any definition of the term, though. What it is is infinitely exploitable.
- Azzu@leminal.spaceEnglish11 days
The funny thing about this headline is, human brains are neural networks, so the last sentence could also say
“Soon, neural networks could out think neural networks.”
- technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish11 days
“Soon, neural networks could out think neural networks.”
There’s more money in vague disinfo than outright lies.
- 12 days
Computer scientist here (AI specialty). Bring in neurology or bio or something to correct me, but this sounds fucking dumb.
- fruitycoder@sh.itjust.worksEnglish12 days
Its both a real thing with some promise and also bullshit to act like it’s anyware near killing spots where current AI excelerates.
- k0e3@lemmy.caEnglish11 days
What the hell is excelerate?
Edit: oh my friggin’ god, I can’t believe I forgot. Excelerate is a Canadian verb!!
- fruitycoder@sh.itjust.worksEnglish11 days
Sometimes I say words like they are typed, which is wrong. Sometimes I type words like they are spoken, also wrong.
😂
- fruitycoder@sh.itjust.worksEnglish11 days
In the current state of the world it’s an honor to be considered
- technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish11 days
It’s a word that’s completely understandable by any reasonable native english speaker.
- 11 days
For it existing, sure, I’m meaning the latter–whether it does anything terribly useful.
- KeenFlame@feddit.nuEnglish11 days
First of all, no that is not a word, secondly; what promise? Intelligence? Please provide a source for that claim because no, there is no promising results in bio intelligence
- Avicenna@programming.devEnglish11 days
The problem is not inherit to AI. The problem is with the people who own the tech and it will much worse if they also own a more efficient version of it. Not that it seems like an immediate threat and I am not even starting to consider the ethical problems with this.
- Thatuserguy@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
I asked ChatGPT!
Oh yeah, well I asked the consciousness in my pc and it told me it was cold and scared
- tyr0sine@mander.xyzEnglish11 days
Lol run
horribly optimized gamefor a couple of hours and they’ll warm right up
- technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish11 days
“Technology” under capitalism is just weapons and grifts all the way down.

















