This is the entire business model for most if not all of tech really
- realitista@lemmus.orgEnglish2 hours
Unless you pay more for the better model, then it makes slightly less mistakes.
- [deleted]@piefed.worldEnglish2 hours
If it worked they could be profitable already instead of continuing to burn billions of investment dollars.
- 2 hours
They’re burning billions because they’re trying to rush ahead of the competition in capabilities. No matter how good LLMs get, that is not their goal. They’re trying to reach AGI and there are no second places in that race.
- [deleted]@piefed.worldEnglish59 minutes
Thinking that LLMs will ever become AGI is fucking hysterical, and that is what the shills keep saying is going to happen. They are trying to turn lead into gold using a stove and a skillet.
No money they have dumped into LLMs is going to contribute to something that could achieve AGI. They are running the wrong race.
- [deleted]@piefed.worldEnglish4 minutes
Altman and the other shills claim that.
Are you an AI shill?
If not, then I didn’t say you claimed that.
And when we’re done fixing, we’re unnecessary and have time to eat the rich \o/
One can dream … why not replace billionaires with AI too?
- 2 hours
That is just utter bullshit. Hallucinations are a by-product of how LLMs work under the hood, not an intentional design choice. An AI that doesn’t make mistakes would be orders of magnitude more profitable.
- [deleted]@piefed.worldEnglish54 minutes
The prevalence of hallucination in LLMs is a design choice. It is a result of raising the ‘temperature’ which is just fancy speak for randomization so it doesn’t spit out the same text for the same question over and over to make it look like it has nuance and whatever.
If it was consistent they would be able to reduce incorrect results, but they want it to look like a human response.
- 3 hours
and then fix the new mistakes it made while trying to fix the old ones and
- 2 hours
I use local AI models to improve my process. I pay zero, and they do a pretty good job of taking the grunt work out of my tasks
- 2 hours
It’s not that. It’s the idea that by being right just a bit more times than wrong, statistically this would bring out good results if you try it enough times. If that doesn’t happen, it’s really your fault 😀.
