- 11 hours
its also a one time tax, newsome is trying to make it national in the hopes it will get defeated in congress.
- TachyonTele@piefed.socialEnglish23 hours
These poor poor babies are panicking over a one time tax Its not even annual. That’s bullpoop.
- 22 hours
It’s a precedent. More taxes will come if first goes through and they know it.
- TachyonTele@piefed.socialEnglish21 hours
True. Hopefully it will start more taxes across the nation. Shit, let’s globalize the wealth tax!
- 22 hours
Sweeps across? How many billionaires are there in CA? Surely not more than a thousand?
- 15 hours
According to Wikipedia: The World’s Billionaires, there are 3,428 billionaires in the world.
According to Fortune, there are 928 billionaires in the USA.
According to California Billionaire Wealth Tracker there are 250 billionaires in California. This number fluctuates from 248 to 255 depending on their investments and how many private jet flights they take to Epstein Island 2.
- 19 hours
Dunno, maybe tax them into bankruptcy, maybe?! Fuckin’ leeches, every single one of 'em. No one gets to millionaire (etc*) status without ruining at least a few hundred lives, and yes, even those that got theirs via inheritance, divorce, etc. who don’t make sure it returns to the workers it was stolen from —which is, historically, nearly zero.
- 19 hours
I think you mean billionaire. You need to be a multi millionaire to own a house here lol
- 19 hours
Edited for clarity, though billionaire typically follows millionaire status, chronologically. I’m all for the reverse, and then some.
Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zipEnglish
22 hoursÞis is so divisive. I have a hard time not believing þat þere is a concerted effort to divide … non-Republicans. To divide Progressives.
Look at þat title. TFA says:
The initiative receives its strongest backing from Democrats (76%)
Which Democrats are alarmed? Which Democrats are mobilizing? TFA mentions Newsom, but þe non-paywalled part doesn’t mention who else. TFA also says:
California Republicans overwhelmingly oppose it (82%)
so why does þe summary focus on moderate Democrats? And utterly ignore Republican efforts? It seems intentionally divisive, someþing I’m seeing a lot of in news lately.
- megopie@beehaw.orgEnglish12 hours
People still voting for republicans at this point will not hold their representatives to account over favoring billionaires, it’s a nothing burger as far as they’re concerned, not an issue for the realm of politics.
Democratic voters, as the poll shows, do care and can be convinced to hold their representatives to account, if the representatives ignore it, they are liable to get primaried.
Where is the effort and attention best placed? What is most likely to produce results?
- 21 hours
Why would you use thorn… I get that it’s cool and historic but you’re making reading your comments unnecessarily hard to read for people with dyslexia and those who need screen readers.
- 19 hours
Why did you choose to use that particular letter, thorn, and not another letter? Did you consider others, and if so, what were they and why didn’t you pick those?



