Fun to watch OS come and go
- 19 hours
Very interesting. I didn’t know Win 2000 was so popular. I was born in the late 90s but I have never seen a Windows 2000 installation in person. I’ve seen lots of Win 95 and 98, we had a bunch of computers with it installed. And of course XP was everywhere. I always assumed that 2000 wasn’t a major release. Can someone from this time shed some light on this?
- Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafeEnglish18 hours
Win2k was one of the best versions of Windows.
It was really the first release of NT for everyone - it added dynamic events (Plug and Play) to NT, and used the same shell (visually) as 9x (though NT4 did too, IIRC).
It replaced the DOS-based version of Windows, and could actually let you use a lot of DOS software still - which NT4 really struggled with.
XP was a step improvement over Win2k, it wasn’t until Win7 that we saw the next big improvement - proper 64 bit support (XP had a version with it but it was a niche thing).
For me, everything after 7 is a disappointment.
- resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafeEnglish12 hours
The biggest thing was DirectX on an NT kernel (starting with Win2000). I think the history of DOS and Windows is inexorably linked to being able to do business and play games on the same machine.
It’s also when Microsoft started certifying drivers. They’d solved a lot of OS bugs with NT4 but systems were still unstable due to poor drivers (and dodgy hardware). WHQL solved a lot of those problems.
XP was more than just a reskin of 2000, but not much more. I think XP feels more significant than it was technically because of the different UI and the longevity due to the troubled Vista launch.
- 19 hours
Windows 2000 was kinda NT 5.0, but brought in a lot of what made Windows 98 great. It was marketed as for servers and business users, but it was the most stable Windows so it was good for everyone. My university gave out these MS multi-install DVDs which meant anyone could use any Microsoft product, so most of my comp sci class was using Windows 2000.
