So doing nothing is the way? There are useful project created with AI but also a lot of harmful ones.
Even I know, that the bigger part of selfhosters are copy and pasting guides and aren’t developer themselve, so why should we not try and at least warn these people?
Thanks for your work, time and effort. I also think, it would be better to separate it and first end the discussion about promotions and co, so it could settle before kicking of another round^^
Nice to see the changes, but may I ask if tagging could be beneficial?
Surely it would help to sort out self promotion, help requests and informational posts.
Also, since we’re all in the lemmy-bubble, a lot of people may despise vibe-coded projects, at least it looks/feels like it, so it may be worth tagging project with AI code?
I’m maybe narrow-minded, but please enlighten me^^
I’m totally on your side about awareness and “you have to check it yourself”.
Nobody is telling AI aided projects are bad. Nobody is saying vibe-coded projects are bad.
The problem with vibe-coded projects is, that on average, the code isn’t checked by the owner itself. Surely there a some people using AI as aid and check it afterwards but this is sadly only a small proportion.
In my honest opinion, we should not create rules around exceptions.
We’re currently in a timeline, where it’s hard to tell what is right and what is wrong about AI usage but we have to start somewhere…