I’m constantly struck by the imagery of the giant warrior from Nausicaa. There is a timeline or a reality where this worked, but they couldn’t help themselves. They woke the beast up the second it was even halfway possible and now it’s tearing itself apart in self-destructive blasts because the whole thing was under-cooked (and probably the completely wrong direction to begin with).

If there’s any consolation here it’s that hopefully this has soured enough people on the idea that a second effort won’t even get off the ground. I hope …

There’s never going to be a “Year of the Linux Desktop” where there’s some critical inflection point like a lot of people think. But Microsoft has fucked up here in assuming that consumer trust is a linear relationship and it’s not. They broke the trust, the cracks are there, and users will keep bleeding. They’ll keep a certain percentage of users through apathy or complacency, but the momentum is flowing in reverse now.

What it takes for any one person to cross over is going to look different, whether that’s Linux getting up to speed on a feature they were looking for or Microsoft crossing yet another unacceptable threshold, but despite all my anger and personal grievances aside, I truly believe Microsoft as a company is incapable of correcting this problem.

Their goals are entirely misaligned, they believe they can dictate the market at the consumer and their revenue is dependent on that. They’re bleeding more money and talent through this AI debacle and that’s making them even less capable of facing and addressing the issues. Unfortunately I don’t think they’ll ever fully implode, but just like Chrome eventually ate IE’s market share and now won’t go away, so it will be with Linux.

Bonus points: I’m calling it, I truly do believe that in ~5 years or so Windows will cease to be its own operating system and start shifting towards a Linux distro with a bespoke DE (again, see Chrome/Edge). They don’t want to have to keep maintaining an OS like this and one of the biggest arguments for doing so has been the backwards compatibility, but everything is cloud and SaaS now and they want to push more business customers in that direction anyway. Server will be a thorn in their side for awhile, but consumer facing Windows distro will be the perfect testing ground. Mark it, ~5 years … EEE

Benn Jordan is a gem, do yourself a favor and just go watch all his stuff.

His latest on robot dogs is amazingly well-executed and researched with terrifying conclusions.

Yeah, nothing will help attract players like diluting any weak identity it already had with an open deluge of metaverse slop. Everything will be everything. It’s not enough to have a product anymore, it has to be a whole ecosystem. God forbid a single bloody dollar slip through your grasp.

House of El - AL: OpenAI’s $1 Trillion Bullsh*t Is Falling Apart

This video covers the topic very well (and I appreciate and recommend her channel overall).

The long and the short of it is, they fucked their product up. Most of us here are not terribly fond of AI, but let’s for a moment just take it for granted that it is a product that does a thing. OpenAI will swap models out on the backend based on your use case and if it detects certain patterns, also as a sort of protective guard rails in some ways. It’s also extremely unclear on billing and token usage (paraphrasing, I’m not intimately familiar with the details myself, watch the video). This is highly problematic if you’re trying to build a service on top of it. AI is extremely finicky and not having clear ideas on token usage limit or what models may be running on the backend can affect that. This has rightly made even the devout users upset at these choices.

And from what I understand in the video, this is not a case with other providers where you stick with exactly the specified model and token usage and billing are more clearly indicated.

So now not only are they fighting a losing battle against the profitability of the entire tech and service model, they have a spurned and dwindling customer base to contend with, too. They are turbo fucked. Still, no one can say how or when this all finally goes tits up, but at least it’s kind of funny.

I go back and forth with Metal Slug. 3 is absolutely peak, but sometimes it’s just too much, you know? 2/X is a bit more of a focused, compact adventure and I really like it for that.

Good write up!

For my own perspective, I’d like to add that I think they’re all worth playing even if you don’t stick them out. I think Castlevania is one of my favorite series to discuss from a media literacy standpoint because it’s easy to the ideas as they evolved over the different games. You don’t even necessarily need to attempt to tackle them in chronological order because the old ones still have a direct and simple charm to them, if that’s your thing.

While Metroidvania has half of Castlevania in it (and all of Metroid), outside of Igarashi’s contribution the series didn’t show a whole lot of interest in following through on a lot of those ideas, especially as it attempted to break into 3D. Curse of Darkness was perhaps the closest, but still not very. It doesn’t surprise me that Igarashi broke off on his own eventually and now does Bloodstained. I think it’s fitting, it’s a good thing to give him his own series (while still holding clear inspirations) and let him do his thing.

I was never a fan of Lords of Shadow and for the longest time I couldn’t quite put my finger on why. As you state, the series is loosely defined as “gothic action with Dracula” so to say something isn’t a “true” Castlevania feels disingenuous. Especially when it was so open to remaking and reinventing itself prior, so what difference is another reboot? There was a clear conversation or thread of design going through the early series up to that point and Lords just kind of tosses all that aside to go in on game design of the day. God of War as you put it. I don’t want to say it’s a bad game or shame you for liking it, but it’s just a bit too far of an outlier for me to really embrace in a meaningful way

OP, you did not mention Vampire Survivors. HAVE YOU PLAYED VAMPIRE SURVIVORS?!

I initially wrote it off because it didn’t look like the kind of game I was into, but the “we have Castlevania at home” vibe is very much intentional and endearing. We 💜 you Antonio Belpaese! For $4 the game looks like a flashy mess, but it hits all the dopamine receptors in just the right way and the metagame of unlocking all the secrets is incredibly satisfying.

Which doesn’t even get into the Castlevania DLC where Konami actually gave them assistance and let them use that delightfully crunchy authentic sprite art. The ending of the DLC (completing Richter’s scenario) legitimately had me in tears, it’s so good and the kind of love letter/wrap up to the series that Konami was never going to give us. Please don’t skip this entry! 😭