For someone who isn’t well versed in open source licensing, what’s wrong with MIT? What’s a good alternative?

EDIT: Thank you gooeyglob@lemmy.world for answering Q1 in another thread

• Using MIT license to me means the product could (and probably would) turn commercial at any moment if it finds success. Yes these projects are free to start, but there could be a huge cost in terms of migration need down the road, if the developer alters the deal.

Personally, I think the real douchebags are web devs who only build and test for chromium based browsers, making some critical tools completely unusable on Firefox/Linux systems. Looking at you, Chase.com.

Really, anyone who develops third-party software that entrenches monopolies.