mathemachristian[he]

Oh the privacy policy?? The thing that they could just update, revoke entirely or even just ignore??

And what do you expect Strömberg to do, sell his half of the company and let it be entirely controlled by Berntsson

not to do business with nazi’s is not a big ask for most people… he owns half the company for crying out loud there is so much damage he could cause, or threaten to cause instead of sending out a mail thats just “we at mullvad don’t like to be seen as nazis but what people heil on their own time is their business”

As far as I’m concerned, ‘liberal’ is the most meaningless word in the dictionary. History has shown me that as long as some white middle-class people can live high on the hog, take vacations to Europe, send their children to private schools, and reap the benefits of their white skin privilege, then they are ‘liberal’. But when times get hard and money gets tight, they pull off that liberal mask and you think you’re talking to Adolf Hitler. They feel sorry for the so-called underprivileged just as long as they can maintain their own privileges.

Assata Shakur

Enlighten me then? Simply calling others stupid and playing coy with your argument isn’t that convincing an argument.

As long as it’s one guy making personal donations and not the company as a whole, yes

that “one guy”? Oh he owns half the company, and we are very happy to run this operation with him don’t worry about him.

saying “well they will lie about it because they’re fascists” is myopic and stupid.

Why?

Moreso than being fascist, they’re fanatical about privacy

and they will be forever and ever? There’s one move fascists have, coast on good will until it’s time for the rug-pull. A lot of fascists started out genuinely believing in some cause but sooner or later they all turn. What with contradictions sharpening and all

Enlighten me how under a fascist takeover it couldn’t be undermined to track undesirables… even if, the owner is a fascist?! Clearly your life wouldn’t be in danger when tracked by a fascist…

Sure lets entrust our privacy with infrastructure owned by a fascist…

But that’s even less reason to give them money, if he is a co-owner part of the profit directly funds fascism. It’s not just about funding the parties, but having mullvad as the defacto gold standard, continuing to do business with them gives fascists co-ownership over parts of privacy-critical infrastructure. It’s not a serviceable VPN provider if it’s co-owned by fascists??

They won’t get rid of him if there is no threat of bankruptcy… “Lets not jump into action maybe they’ll do the right thing” is not a good plan

as in it’s disinfo

Hijab wearing women are forced to wear hijabs because their religion calls for them to be killed if they’re not wearing a hijab

this is just wrong.

What the hell are you smoking??? Try walking around with a khimar in east germany e.g.

Idk what to tell you, I grew up in a muslim majority country and this is my experience with Islam. I have never met someone who said “all who don’t follow it should face eternal conscious torment”. No sorry I have, “fellow” christians…

“they” are just a gray mass to you aren’t they? “They” clearly aren’t individuals in your eyes but a cudgel to wield against west asians under the pretense of human rights. Hundreds of millions of women all the same to you because they arent european…

Women have been killed over these expectations

Is that really what you think muslims support?? Can you not conceive of people wanting to wear a hijab?? And even if not, why is it so hard to accept that it’s just a fact when they say it??

It doesn’t though? Famously non-muslims can get into heaven by living a virtuous life?? I had so many muslims tell me that it’s all good we pray to the same god, or that in the end it’s up to the all-knowing and merciful judge. People who say shit like you have so obviously not spent time with muslims it’s bonkers

Because there only ever is one interpretation of any text and religious people famously all agree on it.

Because everyone who professes to a given religion has access to, reads and observes the texts and definitely doesn’t just go with whatever everyone else is doing and saying and getting their religious belief through osmosis.

Because different sects and cultures don’t weigh some parts heavier than others and local cultural practices and superstitions play no role in how people observe or ignore the text.

Because the text is the only thing that defines a religion and there is nothing else to it.

And of course because you definitely understand the text by just skimming it until you find whatever verse lets you feel euphoric through enlightenment by your own intelligence.

Then I don’t know what you were trying to say with your original comment other than agreeing with me?

Alright! So we agree that ostracizing people or making it illegal for them to wear what they wear is not going to lead to a more free society?

But is he being oppressed?