• 1 post
  • 22 comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: August 14th, 2025
  • Thank you. That article gave me some insights.

    • AI firms fear AI generated content and train their models with books from before. The fact that AI waters down the source data quality, because AI generated data becomes part of the source data. It’s worrying, let’s see where it leads and how the AI effects can be mitigated.
    • Lawsuits seem to be an issue for anthropic and a driver for the scanning program too. Because illegal copies are problematic.
    • The books are destructively scanned and disposed afterwards.
    • In rare cases a 18th century book might be lost. But the ordered books seem to include anything and nothing. The term rare book seems to refer to the fact that a small amount of copies have been printed and only a few copies are available for sale (and the larger part is stored in libraries).
    • Booksellers are both worried and happy at the same time.
  • Without details it feels, like a fear, uncertainty, doubt strategy just for the clicks, to me. I’m missing crucial information for an informed decision. The article is not suitable for much more than igniting anger.

    LLM and AI companies rise a lot of valid criticism, besides its undeniable pros. I don’t like a witch hunt just because it is AI and someone tells me to be angry. I need more facts before I go fetch my pitchfork.

    I.e. I dont get why they destroy the books. Google Books did fine without unbinding/ destroying books. It would help to know what kind of books are processed. And what their process is.

    I don’t have information if the OCRed data is made available to the public. Which would be nice, since the article talks about data that is not yet digitally available.

  • Cancer isn’t spreading from host to host via a medium like bacteria or viruses do. Something is carcinogenic or can cause cancer. But it isn’t spreading. The mechanism is already in the body - cell division. Carcinogenic factors increase the chance, that something goes wrong during the process. And the resulting cells failing to kill themselves. Or the immune system failing to kill them.

    Although… Some say certain infections could lead to cancer. But nitrates are not microbes.

    Q: …
    A: use a test kit. Or send a sample to a lab to be sure.

  • The thing with FOSS is, that market share matters to an extend, only. It’s about support und continued development and financing that (or helping otherwise).

    The strain on the FOSS developers isn’t closely related to the market share. Ok, bigger market share, might help to better the financing.

    But Linux does well with the current share. (Doesn’t mean its devs do too.) Server wise Linux is already here to stay. Desktop wise… It’s much better than years ago, I must say.

    KDE, Pipewire and all the USB and bluetooth device integration is already pretty good. There are bugs and flaws, but nothing serious. Hardware support - I can’t think of any hardware in my possession, that isn’t supported.

    All the office apps, browsers, development environments don’t need Windows anymore.

    Gaming? Steam will continue to nudge developers to release native Linux versions. Or proper wine configs. They have a steam hardware to sell after all.
    Yes, the anti-tamper ring0 and virtualization stuff can’t be easily emulated or virtualized, I heard. Or has that changed?

    Anything else that needs Windows running natively?

    Specialized software still needs native Windows? What about Adobe and the like? Tools without a fully featured replacement and no native Linux version. These might offer Linux support if the share increases.