slazer2au

It’s being pushed into situations where having a black box of probability is not what you want. Support bots as an example, you want the same outcome for the same problem. Not a different outcome because someone didn’t put a question mark.
You don’t want the bot being able to hijack an account because it was asked in the specific way. See Facebook support bot.
https://cybersecuritynews.com/metas-ai-support-bot-instagram/

You don’t want a chat bot to tell airline customers they can do something when the airline has a FAQ section specifically saying no you can’t.
See Air Canada support bot.
https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20240222-air-canada-chatbot-misinformation-what-travellers-should-know

You don’t want AI bots hallucinating court cases to justify a case. Many news articles on this.

It’s used as a workforce reduction mask.
Businesses are using AI rollouts to lower the number of front line employees. Only for the tool to fail.
See Oracle firing 21,000 people to boost ai numbers.
https://www.theregister.com/databases/2026/06/23/21000-oracle-jobs-vanish-amid-big-reds-big-bets-on-ai/5260086

It’s oversold:
When Gardner says only 30% of AI deployments work as sold after asking over 700 IT executives. Why are people still treating it as anything but a broken tool?
https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/04/07/only-28-of-ai-infrastructure-projects-fully-pay-off/5221652

For a black box of probability it is terrible at maths. There has been instances of AIs failing high school math tests.
https://phys.org/news/2026-02-ai-struggle-math-problems.html

edit: sources as I grab them on mobile.

Can see where the inspiration for Hooked came from

According to AI Bros, yes.

According to a survey of 782 I&O managers conducted in November and December of 2025 by Gartner, less the 30% work as sold.
https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/04/07/only-28-of-ai-infrastructure-projects-fully-pay-off/5221652

Nope.

Damn it. Where is that Magento meme

Yep. Welcome to capitalism, where the bigger made up number actually mean very little in real terms.

SPF rating is subjective at best and not a regulated term in many countries.

Australia is a place where it is a regulated term and a test by Choice showed that 16 of 20 products failed their rating and several have since been recalled.
https://www.choice.com.au/health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/skin-care-and-cosmetics/articles/sunscreen-test

Back to your original question which is answered in the article

In percentage figures that means the difference between, say, an SPF 50 sunscreen and an SPF 30 sunscreen is less impactful than you might assume. An SPF of 50 protects you from all but 1/50th of UV rays (98%), while sunscreen with an SPF of 30 protects you from all but 1/30th of UV rays (96.7%).

If the org is not giving you the right tools you either leave or force the issue.

When asked if you are complying with whatever polices you say you are unable to determine that without X tool.
Because when something goes wrong you will get the blame for lying about compliance.

You could at least crop it mate.

$20 probably. Been over a decade since I played pokies.

A female nipple specifically. Male ones are all good.

If like me you can’t read source code I would trust it the same as a close source app.

This is your once a post reminder to take your meds.

Maximum freedom to post any topic without restrictions

An account less then a day old from an instance with open signup asking about no restriction posting to popular communities. Anyone else think this is a sockpuppet for someone who has been recently banned?

If you used a llm to generate code, how are you licensing this under AGPL? LLM output is not copy-protected.

Not the ISPs problem at all.

Blame IoT manufacturers for providing shit devices that can easily be hacked.

Theere is no difference from a technical standpoint between a business and residential IP. It’s allocation is tied to the network provider.

People install extensions onto browsers for any number of reasons without knowing what it does. It was a problem is the 90s that never went away.

Yep. There are many billions of people around the world who don’t know you exist yet you do. Although how sure are you that you exist?

Oh hey it’s another person with a young account of 9 days who gets banned from a community and tells the mods to kill themselves then complains about the internet being the internet.

No, open source is here to stay. Much of Google’s own infrastructure is based on open source.
What they are trying to do is limit people from installing apps non storefront sources. The thing Apple has just been slapped in Europe for.

For technical people it won’t be an issue we have ways to ignore Google’s bullshit but for non tech people it may prevent some phone malware from getting installed. Although it doubt it.

Op is a registered nurse as they have said several times in other posts and should know why this happens. If they don’t know why perhaps they should do some continuing education to update their medical knowledge.