he/him
Well I agree that people shouldn’t lose their income via an automated decision, but the article isn’t really clear about why that’s a GDPR violation. So I understand and agree with the premise and conclusion, but not really the use of GDPR to justify the fine?
ask your regular therapist. they’ll be very familiar with the industry and the norms and which places to avoid etc.
I saw this interesting postmortem analysing what happened to the podcast.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYRpJf1lor0
I listened to every episode from beginning to end in real time and I’m still really annoyed at grey for ending it that way. I’ve really soured to him a lot over the last few years, down from one of my favourite online creators for many years.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I just looked at the actual posts in the community, since I didn’t before. Most of them don’t even look that questionable tbh, although a couple do. But they’re all just naked people posing for the camera. It’s not like they’re dressed as school girls or anything. And every post has the age verification as required by the rule, and most of the images have company watermarks on them. They’re professional shots, not amateur candids. There’s nothing about the posts that implies that the models are underage other than the title of the community. As someone else said, they could be listed as “legal teens” instead and I doubt anyone would bat an eye.
I also think most people here care more about actual harm than legality.
Well this post is specifically about the legality, trying to frame it as illegal content. But, that aside, I just don’t see the “actual harm” being done. If visitors are fully aware that they’re looking at adults, and every post explicitly reaffirms the age of the specific model shown, then I don’t see the harm there.
Should they allow written rape fantasies of minors?
No, because that’s illegal.
this is rather normalizing and harm producing
I just don’t agree with the slippery slope argument. It comes down to saying that “well if they’re looking at 19 and 18 year olds, then next thing is that they’ll be looking at 17 year olds and then 14 year olds!!”. Like I said, there’s a clear line, and getting close to it isn’t the same as crossing it.
eh, I checked the linked community. They have a rule that posters must link to the model’s verification that they’re overage on every post:
Age verification info for models required; OnlyFans, Fansly profile links are acceptable.
Seems fine to me. This sounds like a whole lot of virtue signalling and pearl-clutching.
There’s a very clear line in the sand to me: don’t post anyone underage. Posting overage girls is fine to me no matter what they look like. Should the “small boobs” community also be banned because people might mistake a 25 year old with As for a 15 year old? Come on.
What a whole lot of nothing. You/they are accusing them of “hosting child pornography” on the basis that they have nude images of proven-overage adults.
Ragebait title too.
Nah I just tried it out loud and did it in 2 breaths on my first go. I’m sure if I cared I could probably get through it in one breath.
edit: ok fine it’s sunday and I apparently need something to do. I tried on a regular breath and ran out, so I tried again on a very full lung and was able to just barely get through on one breath. It’s been such a productive afternoon.