Nope, that makes perfect sense to me without which that or who.

“Washington cats florida rats chase annoy vegas whores”

1. The washington cats 2. Which florida rats chase 3. They annoy vegas whores

It’s a question of where you put pauses and intonation, when sounding it out in your head (or to another person). If you read it monotone it makes little sense. Unfortunately, knowing how its said requires deciphering it first. A lot of english novels have stuff like this, you’ll probably find - you have to read sentences twice to understand what it means

Not an essential word if you the listener have context! It’s just that understanding this phrase is reliant on reader knowing context (i…e either that buffalo tend to buffalo buffalo OR just the theory/gimmick of the sentence itself.)

Also i believe OP made some effort to indicate via Capitalisation that one repeated buffalo is a proper noun. (Place name)

See: Buffalo(pl) buffalo(an) Buffalo(pl) buffalo(an) buffalo(vrb), buffalo(vrb) Buffalo(pl) buffalo(an)

pl: place, an: animal, vrb: verb.

I seek neither to rule nor to serve.
And its hands would weave the entrails of the priest,
For the lack of a cord with which to strangle kings.

What does that even mean? What thing’s hands are we talking aboit by the second line?

I love the term ‘space alien’. I think that’s how aliens would like to be called.

Since the question of earthly citizenship comes first, i don’t think american citizenship would even be considered (de juris citizenship ((birthright citizenship)) applies only to humans i think, anyway, so alien would be comsidered an animal for the purposes of not filing paperwork on it)

Does Earth have de juris citizenship? For all species in general i don’t think anyone has written that it does, but i bet the UN woild support considering that Space Alien to be the first of its species native to Earth.

However, the alien species might not even have a concept themselves of de juris citizenship and may only care about bloodline.

😍

That makes sense! Thank you

That’s fair enough. I don’t see the star of David going out of fashion as a symbol anyway. Point about England is good.

Syria flag apparently changed without me knowing. I will sleep well tonight. All it took was deposing Bashar Al Assad

great post

Let’s make a tierlist sbout how urgent it is for them to change:

S:

• Poland’s flag is supposedly derived from a white bird against a setting sun. To me it would make sense to include that imagery on the flag, or a historical coat of arms.
• I think places like Syria, Egypt, Libya, Iraq need to agree on a different colour scheme for themselves. At the moment they’re confusingly similar
• Russia’s current flsg i bslieve it’s literslly just copying the french and netherlands colours because Peter the Great was so inspired by them.

A:

• Israel (changing flag after a hopeful regime change would be prudent because it’s like a symbol of genocide now.)

B:

• Luxembourg (too similar to Netherlands),
• China (i find china’s flag really dull even if it is iconic. They surely want to invoke their historical longevity rather than just Communism. Stars represent the key chinese regions, which seems like a good feature - the red does not.)

F:

• I don’t think i’d change it, but Canada seems as/more close to britain than Australia so it makes more sense to give a little Union Jack in the top left corner.

I have to say i think i’ve allowed dreams to influence my relationships with people.

Right and the annoying thing about those dreams is that your brain never seems to utilise those features ever again, only once. When i dream, a 4D cinematic experience would be nice! Does make nightmares worse, though.

I’m so sorry to hear that dude, and let’s take a moment to be celebrste the fact you’re still alive - because whether it’s dumb-luck or down to you taking good care of yourself, it’s still worth being joyous about.

As for being failed by social welfare, you’re in good company because a lot of people on the fediverse are also struggling to thrive in modern “1st world” countries despite being smart and articulate people. Some have the same story as you. I think you will get a lot out of fediverse as a social media, i know i have and i’ve only been here ~ 7 months. It’s heakthy because it’s more like old fashioned forums. (Old fashioned in terms of the internet’s lifespan)

Even today i am a toddler at heart. I resigned mysekf to being a sidequest guy a while ago

Ah this is also how people historically deal with children following them around in real life. Great things ahead. An army of urchins at OP’s disposal.

Okay I do get you, sorry.

What’s wrong with the subject matter? I thought it was an anti-war reflective novel publiished after and written about world war 1. Just a german version of something like 1917 or War Horse, right?

Shower Actions

I’m in favour of leaving the prequels as they are, but it wouldn’t upset me if they remade any of the movies. As long as it’s an actual remake and not minute cgi changes or dumping CGI assets into the OT films (they did this).

Like, Disney could have and probably should have just done animated versions of the original trilogy, seeing as they chose to rehash the general shell of the story and pass it off as a sequel trilogy. I would not have cared if they did that - i would have avoided watching just to save money but i think that would be the logical first step for disney, childrens’ animation producer, to do with Star Wars, beloved franchise, and it would have helped to draw in a new generation of fans.

If they’d even rehashed the story a bit, e.g “fixed the prequels,” added more female protags in the OT, made it more sparkly and disney-esque, then that’s fine. Loads of Sci-Fi franchises have had reboots like that, and fans are capable of seperating original from new wave interpretation (Stargate and I think Star Trek are some examples of this.)

Congratulations and welcome back, Nostradamus

Based analysis