LurkingLuddite

lol have fun on your moral high ground while the world dies around you.

Nah. Not nearly that high a percentage of the population.

lol you don’t even understand what you’re afraid of… that is beyond sad.

lol your snark will not save you, and that’s hilariously pathetic. Of you. You won’t be spared.

I’m not saying, “don’t do anything”. In fact, I mean to say you should be MORE pissed off.

These cretins are STILL fucking up the world EVEN MORE, yet you’re just here whining about it… Fucking sad.

Who says I’m not? I’m just doing things I cannot speak of, because I don’t want to be on any more watchlists than I am… and no, the fediverse IS NOT anonymous enough.

Your disbelief will never save humanity. The fact my obvious opinion was downvoted so far only speaks to how utterly FUCKED we are as a species, because most of you fucking worms are too stupid to understand the scale of this problem.

You shouldn’t be angry at me, but at all the corporations and billionares constantly fucking the planet even harder. Yet here you are, grandstanding on my account. Genuinely, pathetic.

rofl no. No, an RO system will not add more plastic to your water than the MILES of pipeline your city water went through to reach your house, or even the MANY feet of plastic pipe that sit in modern walls… Your ignorance is pathetic, and not in any way that you should be proud of.

Eh. No. I’d argue actual minimal spending should say that these services never learn what the internet is.

Why make the distinction? Exactly! They made no distinction, except for adding the token…

While my example was warning against cliche extremes, you point at the exact other end of tokenization that exists in droves in modern media. Vapid, stupid, uncreative, and pointless “representation” that does nothing but assuage the ignorant and inflame the opposition.

Describing the extra steps does not magically make them not extra steps.

Damn I really want to see these tits, too, now… Is this the new Roko’s basilisk!?

lol let me demonstrate what actually not caring what you have to say looks like…

Nawww I totally meant what I said. Unfortunately for those that disagree who cannot read English, I explained a basic function with plenty of ‘ifs’ involved, so… good luck proving me wrong!!

The law of large numbers eludes you, and that’s sad and rather pathetic from my point of view.

Project Farm (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vR15u0vmms in this case) is an excellent source of unbiased reviews.

He’s not always the most in-depth, and his reviews can miss some important usability metrics, but he’s excellent for showing his work. If you want good A/B reviews, I’d be hard pressed to not recommend him. Just mind that some of the items he shows aren’t going to be as easy as they look to use.

(my opinion came from my experience, so I won’t be shocked if his tests disagree, but he’s still a good recommendation for a huge variety of goods) EG: Some of these glues really suck at adhering to certain surfaces, so it really can be a case by case basis as to which is absolutely best.

Nope. Purely wrong. The answer to the paradox of tolerance is to only use violence in defense.

Yes, that is also a grey zone to many perspectives, but things rapidly become clear if you expand the scope of the question… For an example: Trump’s ignorant, braindead policies on immigration and “sanctuary cities” DOES make sense … if you’re an isolated dipshit desperately trying to climb the unfair social ladder Trump and his ilk constructed… Though if you expand it to the scope of humanity and all the gains we see when people (let alone disparate cultures) work together, his policies are a HUGE loss.

Spoilers: If someone wants to go out of their way to kill someone who will only get violent in defense, that means that they want to ATTACK those people.

lol

Luigi was successful. Temporarily.

One might argue the “temporary” could be fixed by increasing the magnitude of the solution…

The correct answer to someone who will not stop violence is to violently end them.

No, it’s not pretty. No, it’s not comfortable. No, it’s not easy to do so while retaining the optics of the moral high ground. Yet that is the only answer that actually works.

Naww I actually fully agree with the idea that it could (and should) work in an ideal world. Just that such a plan would still definitely come with some intrinsic cost/effort, even beyond keeping the shed a viable shed.

Also, people DO have access to chainsaws, so if you’re afraid of loons getting chainsaws… you might just be a bigger coward than you are smart…