As He died to make men holy
Let us die to make things cheap

  • 0 posts
  • 19 comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: January 8th, 2024
  • Edit: @plyth@feddit.org pointed out that Motorola is in fact split into two separate companies. The phone company is effectively Lenovo, so Chinese, and not related to the American surveillance technology branch.

    Not sure I’d trust Lenovo/Motorola Mobility either, but that’s a different story.

    In June 2026, Motorola bricked its whole line of routers without any explanation, leaving their customers with broken hardware.


    The main thing you’re supporting is Motorola, the second biggest provider of surveillance technology in the US after Flock. Deflock lists 5% of the cameras as Motorola, but the share is increasing as backlash against Flock is growing and Flock cameras are replaced with more low key competitors.

    404media has reported on how Motorola cameras are used by ice.

    “Gotta support the cause” is one hell of a dangerous sentiment under capitalism.

  • I care more about privacy and security than I do about throwing a few bucks at Google’s hardware division.

    And I’m more worried about surveillance capitalism, the rise of fascism, attacks on software freedom, the unsustainable exploitation of natural resources, and modern day slavery than I am about extremely targeted local security threats. But I also respect that others have different threat models. Some journalists and community organizers in [aspiring] dictatorships need higher security standards than I do, and they are only able to meet these standards because enthusiasts choose to make it a priority.

    I live in Europe, and I don’t find it very difficult to avoid overly evil shit. I wouldn’t travel to the US, and if I did I wouldn’t want to bring any personal electronics with me.

  • And yet they have the entire industry in the palm of their hand.

    For me it’s a no-brainer. I don’t buy products from Google, Amazon, Musk, Zuckerberg, or anyone else who obviously want to do me harm. Any path towards a better world sold to me by the people who are busy destroying the current one will be treated with immense scepticism.

    I don’t see much point arguing further why I wouldn’t buy my privacy respecting hardware from Google or de facto Flock. We probably have different priorities.

  • I use a degoogled Fairphone. No money going to Google when I bought it, no data going to Google while I use it. You can also buy Fairphones new without Google Android.

    more harmful than even throwing a couple bucks back at Google directly for hardware that will probably end up costing them more money than it makes them when you remove all their spyware.

    This seems delusional. Even if they don’t run on huge profits from selling their devices you end up supporting their market dominance.

  • While there’s no ethical consumption under capitalism yadda yadda there’s still degrees of bad. I would not buy from a company who is actively building the infrastructure of the fascist surveillance state. By Google phone here I meant a Google brand phone, not a phone that comes with Google Android. Buying a Google Pixel second hand is obviously better than buying anything new.

    Basically I think it’s worth trying to avoid buying things from people who want to do you harm, and when compromises have to be made it’s still worth settling for less evil. Motorola and Google are not that.

  • As other people in this thread points out, WSL is not ideal but it really saves the ass of anyone forced to use Windows at work.

    I have a thinkpad handed to me from work with windows on it and all the usual restrictions. I tried for a while to use it by constantly running a virtual machine with Linux, but Windows is not a stable enough environment to host that. So in the end I just bought myself a framework laptop because nobody actually controls that I use the laptop provided by work.

    Not everyone is that lucky. Canonical found a way to make their life easier. I think that’s objectively great, no matter what you think about Canonical as a company.

    WSL is not generally something people use because they are afraid of changing to Linux, they use it because they are not allowed by IT to change their OS.

  • In general it seems to me Firefox codebase is too big for any of the current forks to really be independent alternatives. It’s all just my opinion and personal experience though. Librewolf has different priorities to me to the point where I found that usability suffered, whereas Waterfox’ inclusion of Brave’s adnlock engine is highly unwelcome in my book - I want nothing to do with brave. Zen Browser seemed messy to me, though I can see how it’s great for others.

    It seems to me Chromium, WebKit and Servo are better at separating the engine from the browser, making it possible for smaller actors to make their own browsers without forking the engine. A Firefox fork seems to me to just become a very big thing very fast, and one that requires a large dedicated team to be done right. I know other people enjoy the forks, they just never feel quite right to me.

    In short, if Mozilla has turned evil and does shitty things to Gecko as a result, I don’t trust that the current forks of Firefox can really provide a real alternative as they depend on upstream development of Firefox.