floquant

No.

But apparently still somehow good for The Economy™!

They’ll just get AI to design hard drives that don’t fail and chips that are immune to cosmic rays, duh.

A country

Could you tell us how creators such as yourself want to use HEVC at 30p so we can provide feedback to our design team?

I just want to fucking choose what I want without having to provide a “user story”!! I HATE uber-market-optimized software and products, give me fucking settings instead of trying to guess for me!

Salt??

my response is basically not until I understand it…

That was probably a good call, firewalling and (lack of) DHCP especially is quite different so just trying to use v4 concepts on v6 addresses/networks is almost a guaranteed bad time

A low center of gravity is more stable than a high one.

Gyroscopic effects do exist on bikes but they are not the main source of stability - it’s the fork geometry, which tends to straighten the handlebar

I’m not saying it doesn’t matter, it’s indeed a win.

But how strong of a win when due process is optional now?

Everyone seems to think that IPv6 is a complicated solution to a simple problem, it’s not. If you want to learn more, I managed to track down an article I read a while ago from one of the original IPng engineers. https://github.com/becarpenter/book6/blob/main/01. Introduction and Foreword/Why IPv6 is so complicated.md

That’s not how header backward compatibility works. IPv4 routers would discard the packet, not prepend zeroes.

You already have a bunch of NAT-level suggestions, so I wanted to mention there’s an alternative solution: split-horizon DNS, or simply split DNS. Basically, you run a DNS server in your LAN (like pi-hole) which resolves to the private IP, so resolving externally and internally give different results. This way packets don’t hit the router at all. You can also do a wildcard like *.something.lan to avoid having to add a record for every service, and only configure your reverse proxy.

The pirate bay was in Sweden though

Probably would’ve been worthless since they were talking over it

Some people find fun to be the point

Knowing is facts, not opinions

You can’t correct an opinion, own it or shut up

Are you saying asymmetric cryptography doesn’t exist or is not secure? You may want to collect your research prize and/or bring down the global banking system

I’d bet money an update will fix it. Why don’t you update regularly?

I assume it would be something like a key that gets used to generate disposable signatures, not transmitted directly. But I’ve also been unable to find actual technical details, the article mentions a “GitHub proposal” without linking to it but i couldn’t find anything in their repos. Their blog has nothing either