
That’s the nature of patriarchy. Women are to be protected while most men are disposable.

That’s the nature of patriarchy. Women are to be protected while most men are disposable.

Would you say women and men are targeted in equal proportions or that one group is targeted over the other based on “perceived value”? Like I am not saying you are wrong, I am just saying, “yes, and”

That’s an ideal solution. The best solution is what works immediately and within your capabilities.

I mean, why do you think they are targeting women in the first place?

We can simply build the tech then throw the billionaires out.
We did that with the fediverse but the billionaires still control the online conversation.
I just want a livable community that doesn’t make my kids sick.

You’ll be able to interact with your agent through any device, including your glasses to keep you present in the moment with the people you care about.
The guy still thinks his pervert glasses is a product we want. There isn’t a single original thought under that perm of his.

They do have billionaires, but they aren’t calling the shots. Just ask Jack Ma

But what is intelligence?
-every idiot who can’t tell the difference when they talk to a clanker

“Progressive” is born out of trying to rebrand. Whatever label you choose, the media will define it.

You have the media saying empathy is bad. You are never going to win against the media by policing labels, that is what they do. You win by staying on message about the issues and policies.
Putting aside assembly code gets compiled as well, the bottle neck is always validation of these systems. Making the systems more opaque makes the already difficult task of ensuring it works even harder.
More or less what happened to my former project manager.
“You mean you have to use your hands? That’s like a baby’s toy!”
All the city council people i know got their job because the big developers in the area backed them. One of them even owns 100k+ stock in palantir. We need ranked choice voting so bad

Like the mangrove forests in Africa and Asia. Scarcity is a feature, not a bug.

Sure you can make the technology more resilient but if the enforcement is punitive enough then it won’t matter.
Yes this impacts everyone and everyone should be concerned. But the solution is in mass politics, not in “electing” another death cult leader. The conservative framework is fundamentally unable to address this issue.
Edit: after watching the video I would say the title reflects her audience.