You must log in or register to comment.
- callous_trog@lemmy.zipEnglish12 days
Seems like a great way to get rear ended by a Tesla autopilot driver.
- 12 days
Seems like a great way to get an insurance payout from a Tesla autopilot driver.
- AgentSeven@lemmy.zipEnglish12 days
Except insurance has basically decided it doesn’t need to actually pay for the most part.
- 12 days
At some point people are just going to roll the dice on this bullshit. If they aren’t gonna pay out when they should why are we even paying them? This seems incredibly criminal to deny payment while accepting increasing payments.
- Passerby6497@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
If they aren’t gonna pay out when they should why are we even paying them?
Because you can end up losing your car, being fined thousands of dollars, or in jail for driving without insurance. The fact the peasants get no value from it isn’t important, you better keep paying!
- Kairos@lemmy.todayEnglish12 days
The figures don’t mean insurers rejected nearly half of otherwise valid claims. Claims can close without payment because another insurer covered the loss, a customer withdrew the claim, damages fell below the deductible or the loss wasn’t covered by the policy.
You can’t just say this shit and then just dismiss it:
Still, the increase suggests motorists face greater scrutiny when seeking compensation for some of the most complicated and costly types of auto claims.
- chiliedogg@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
You don’t need dazzle paint to get hit by a Tesla.
I live in an area where Tesla and Waymo both operate taxis. Waymo is actually pretty solid. Those cars are some of the best, most-predictable drivers on the road. Tesla cabs are meth-addicted clankers.
- muzzle@lemmy.zipEnglish12 days
I think the correct xkcd for this arms race is: https://xkcd.com/3167/
- anomnom@sh.itjust.worksEnglish12 days
I like this one more
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/1897:_Self_Driving
12 daysThis approach only works in daylight with cameras that rely on colour only. Infrared spectrum cameras such as what Australia uses on mobile phone traffic cameras are much harder to deal with. Patterns don’t cut it and it’s a huge part of military research into hiding vehicles from infrared spotters.
Disabling the cameras entirely is much more effective.
- lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish12 days
No need, you can just use an IR spotlight to blind the camera. Unlike the military you’re not trying to hide the vehicle.
But either way you’re actively trying to avoid being picked up by speed cameras so you get a fine.
This isn’t about speed cameras, it’s about “safety” surveillance cameras. No laws have to be broken. Evading Flock isn’t illegal
- Cocodapuf@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
Not really. We don’t have materials that absorb or reflect infrared light. It’s one of the reasons it’s hard to beat inferred-guided (heat seeking) missiles, the only real solution is to drop something hotter than your plane, aka a flare.
So… get ready for a new era of commercial automotive flares I guess?
- Eheran@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
You are mixing different types of IR and on top are wrong for both cases too. We have materials for both NIR and thermal IR that absorb or reflect them.
- Cocodapuf@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
I’ve been wrong before, this wouldn’t be the first time. But what part of it was wrong? Genuinely, can you clear it up?
As far as absorbing IR light, I’m not even sure how that would work, wouldn’t it just be emitted again as heat?
- Eheran@lemmy.worldEnglish10 days
So if we focus on thermal IR: shiny metal surfaces hardly emit or absorb it. A black surface emits and absorbs as much as possible. We quantify this via the emissivity (and also reflectivity, shiny metal is a mirror). Emissivity of 1 = theoretical maximum of a prefect absorber/emitter (both are directly linked), everyday stuff like skin or wood is about 0.95, shiny metal surfaces roughly 0.1, a rusty or painted surface again about 0.95.
You only emit and absorb the same in thermal equilibrium. If the surface is hotter, it emits more. If it is colder, it absorbs more.
- Cocodapuf@lemmy.worldEnglish9 days
So with that last part, I get that in theory, but practically, you can only really absorb IR temporarily, right? Because it all gets released again as heat eventually. Like, say you have a mostly inert object, that isn’t creating any meaningful amount of heat. If you hit that object with 10 joules of thermal IR, over time, wouldn’t nearly all of that energy be either reflected or emitted off it as IR radiation?
- Eheran@lemmy.worldEnglish8 days
That is how heat works in general, but that has nothing directly to do with reflecting or absorbing IR.
- MangoCats@feddit.itEnglish12 days
For IR you can feasibly run IR dazzle lights all over whatever you want to mask, including your face.
- gothic_lemons@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
Dumb question I have no idea how infrared light works and cameras. But what if my license plate was just constantly firing infrared light to counter act or “blind” the cameras?
- partofthevoice@lemmy.zipEnglish12 days
Are infrared cameras only detecting the vehicle or are they getting the license plate too?
- ReignOfTerror@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
I wonder if those cameras stop working if you have the new IR blocking window tint that keeps the suns heat out but are otherwise clear. Would the camera just not be able to see inside the car at all?
A fun experiment, but the real solution is preventing all the shit in the first place by government regulation.
I saw a post yesterday with practical suggestions about how to move that process along.
The same governments that are pocketing the sweet Flock dollars to ignore public opinion?
My solution so far is a bike rack that blocks my plate from view. Easy enough to feign ignorance and “correct it” in the moment. Flocks database no doubt has an entry for [color][make][model], but at least it’s not associated with me directly through motor vehicle bureau records.
- ayyy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish12 days
I’m pretty sure based on previous reporting that they will just track you as “blue car with this specific model of bike rack”.
I am sure of that too. Best I can do is try to avoid linking it to my name.
- flandish@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
adding it also logs your phone, earpods, etc signals alongside the car’s data.
Are you in one of the nice states that doesn’t require front license plates?
I’m not a big fan of adapting to fascism, but sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.
- Cocodapuf@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
Have they tried painting a fire hydrant a truck and and a bicycle on the back? Let’s test if these cameras are a robot or not.
- Cocodapuf@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
To me, this looks a lot like taking one dose of a prescribed antibiotic. All it really succeeds in doing is training dazzle resistant strains of cameras.
Trying to trick the cameras is playing into an expensive game of cat and mouse. And sure, fine, that may work for a little while, but it’s not a solution.
- PattyMcB@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
Spend a large sum (for some) of money to make my vehicle look stupid vs. they can fuck off with their privacy-invading cameras.
I prefer “they can fuck off”
- glimse@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
I mean at least they’re trying…? Your alternative isn’t really a solution
Spend a large sum of money on a suit of armor vs. they can fuckin stab me
I prefer “they can fuckin stab me”
- 12 days
I prefer “they can fuckin stab me”
Well, alright… :grabs a stabby:
;-)
- PattyMcB@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
No… it’s actually “stick your knife up your ass instead of into me”
- glimse@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
They are still tracking you. This guy didn’t opt in to be tracked so he could give the car wrap a try.
Unless you’re implying you’d destroy the cameras. In which case, that wasn’t clear but I wholly support it
- crank0271@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
From this bit in the article:
The pattern does not stop a camera from recording. Instead, it is designed to prevent the software connected to the camera from recognizing what it sees. A person or car wearing the pattern would still appear in the footage, but the detection system may not flag it as a person or vehicle.
I wonder if these systems won’t “notice” and record the license plate on its own if they don’t think there’s a vehicle present.
- Steve@startrek.websiteEnglish12 days
Detected smudge with license plate. SWAT team has been dispatched.
- otacon239@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
That’s the trick, though. With these patterns, the camera doesn’t even recognize that there’s a car there at all.
- frongt@lemmy.zipEnglish12 days
There’s an idea. Start putting fake license plates everywhere to poison ALPRs.
- 12 days
“Let’s hear it for the vague blur” -p k dick, A Scanner Darkly
- 12 days
More likely is that these companies will just update their models to identify these vehicles once again. Furthermore, patterns like this make the car really stand out from the crowd which is a terrible way to disguise yourself.
- 12 days
Correct. The arms race of evolution never stops. Eternal vigilance.
- RaoulDook@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
Benn Jordan did a video on that, he was able to add patterns of stuff to make plates unreadable by ALPR systems. He didn’t share the pattern for people to use as it may be illegal, but you can see it in the video
- 12 days
Interesting. I have this Tshirt from a few years ago.
The vendor’s website still has anti-AI patterns, but removed the license plates prints.
- Cricket@lemmy.zipEnglish12 days
Where and under what circumstances? Do you have a link for more information? In my US state, I see reproduced license plates (i.e., not the original state-issued metal ones) all the time. Like stickers, e-paper (I think?), etc.
- decolo@piefed.socialEnglish12 days
now find something that stops it from reading Bluetooth and other RF signals. I wonder if anyone has acquired one for security research
- 12 days
It would be simpler to just overlay Bluetooth or RF signals it can read with signals so numerous and strong that it is overwhelmed. The main problem with that is the size of the hardware you’d need.
You could pull the 20 phones in a trench coat thing that one guy did to create “traffic jams” where there were no cars.
RF shields already exist, so you could in theory cover the car with it, it could be a problem tho since you can’t really do calls and listen to the radio anymore but i guess you can just put an antenna
- maturelemontree@lemmy.zipEnglish12 days
That and for it to actually work you’d have to cover your windshield and other windows.
I meann, is it necessary? Bluethoot is already weak, i feel like that without covering windshield and windows it wouldn’t be strong enough to be detected outside
- cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish12 days
Just put the phone in a Faraday cage and turn off the bluetooth devices. You will need an older car without bluetooth and telemetry built in though.
- REDACTED@infosec.pubEnglish12 days
For some reason I imagined a car covered (colored) in fake license plates
- 12 days
Seems like a good way to get stopped by police and have your car impounded.
- XeroxCool@lemmy.worldEnglish12 days
Car enthusiasts seem to get away with alternate plates around me. Sometimes plates from the manufacturer country, sometimes decorative plates resembling the local jurisdiction but being the car’s name or year/model. Either there’s nothing specifically against additional plates that are clearly “novelty” items or my local police just don’t care. Now, if they’re legitimate government-made plates, I’d bet you’d run into issues.
I’m sure you could add something that expands your plate info, but I can’t see a solution that keeps your true plate visible (to avoid direct police activity) without also keeping your actual plate number as part of the character string associated with your vehicle. I do recall reflective letters being sold at one point to defeat standard speed/light cameras (plate is reflective by default, characters are not). But, still, with all the extra details the system logs with y/m/m/c, stickers, attachments, and damage, I regrettably don’t see this being especially effective. But, I suppose, it has a chance to keep your unique vehicle unassociated with government records… For now.
- Manjushri@piefed.socialEnglish12 days
Lol. Those flock cameras must be sending out a recognizable signal, right? Link this to a detector and it could automatically hide your plate when a camera is in range and then flip it back when. You leave range.
- SalamiDommie@lemmus.orgEnglish11 days
Looks like Donut Media. A YT car channel I once live that sucks because they sold off to an investment group. And the investment group is really really bad at the content.
