A lot of states are named after the natives they genocided

The short form really fucks people up. Tiktok specially is less important. Reels and youtube shorts both as well

Last mile is solved by small folding bikes like the Brompton with ease. Also, 2 weeks worth of groceries is just so many groceries. You don’t need that many at once, lol

not to mention the inherent issues of being stuffed into a bus, let me know.

???

Or maybe I was talking about how the material fed into the AI was largely pirated content that they did not pay for. Content, that if you are a human, you’d legally have to pay to read. And they got away with pirating jusssst fine for commerical use.

I don’t need to get into flimsy but still correct shit about how there’s a substantial difference between only extracting from other’s content compared to writing with your own experiences combined, because they committed crimes to obtain the data that they used to create AI.

More however, you pretend that personal hardware somehow doesn’t have an environmental impact? That’s also laughable.

My call of bullshit was correct, so I’m going to laugh at you complaining about it

This is precisely why I called your bullshit from the first comment.

No. I’m calling you out because you already know the theft arguments, and are intentionally calling them bullshit.

If you ascribe non validity to every argument you dislike, it’s a matter of course that you’ll only find your viewpoint the only valid one.

Meta cognition can suck when you realize you’re falling into a mental trap but can’t stop yourself

Kanji is 漢字。presumably that’s Chinese

That’s a pretty blind take that ignores the other reasons people hate AI. Also, good lord tech bro logic.

Mouse lemming is making a ridiculous claim— dispensaries won’t stop selling.

Chong as well, as for the most part bosses can already decide and a large portion decide not to test.

So you want to medically hurt others ability to function just because boss might find out? Lol

This is not the xkcd I thought you were going to use

Yeah, like pretending genociding Ukrainianes is because of nato

aggression with an expansionist agenda.

especially by a country and especially unprovoked.

Economically or militarily.

D-day wouldn’t be included because the goal wasn’t expansion. Though I would be very surprised if the usa and Europe hadn’t perpetrated many acts that should be included during the full course of the war.

And of course you can get into the argument of cultural imperialism as well

The Marxist definition is strictly different, not a clarification. The Marxist one posits only capitalism can be imperialist, something I would say is strictly incorrect

Marxist does not get to exclusively define what imperialism is. A more standard definition is far more reasonable to use. However, your comment is very informative to me, I’m glad you took the time to write this out

Nato is not a risk to russia, and never has been. Nato is a defensive alliance. The only way they’re a risk is if russia plans to attack them first. Anyone suggesting that nato provoked it is on something

Invading for territory gain is absolutely synonymous with imperialistic tendencies