Imo, pork is tea. In some places, people drink it more than water. It can be really fancy, or super simple. It’s good when you make it with some sugar.
Where is the hate? Just because you aren’t glazing something doesn’t mean you are hating on it
Was trying to be objective about it. Water is inherently neutral in flavor. Anything that is less than neutral wouldn’t be worth drinking. Now what that is will be different for each person.
Edit: also, i don’t say anything about cooking or using a liquid…i said drinking it. Your critique is inapplicable.
Of all the meats, chicken is the least offensive flavor-wise. It’s soup is synonymous with being ill, or having difficulty keeping food down. It is basically the water of meat.
Sub-thought: therefore, i shouldn’t eat meat that tastes worse than chicken. That would be like drinking something that tastes worse than water…yuck.
Tool’s members are pretty boring… Except Maynard … Who plays in multiple bands, runs a winery/vineyard, runs several businesses, and yells at people to get off his lawn…
You are describing me. It stops my own thoughts from being too bleak.
A valid contract under US common law (which has it’s roots in English common law) requires three things: offer, acceptance, and consideration (which means each side gives up a legal right in exchange for something, i.e. you become bound to pay a monthly fee in exchange for the other side being obligated to provide a service). So when a company sends you a contract with pre-set terms (an offer), you can either sign that pre-drafted contract (acceptance), ignore it (rejection), or change one or more terms and send it back to the drafter to either accept or reject (rejection and counter-offer).
Every time language is changed it rejects the previous offer and creates a new counter offer. You don’t have a “contract” until an offer is accepted with no changes (also known as mutual assent).
As a practical matter, no large company is going to accept a counter-offer for a contract with one consumer. Their entire apparatus is constructed to serve the terms of a form contract. There is no practical way for a company with thousands/millions of customers to honor the unique terms of one customer’s contract.
With that being said, even if a company could theoretically honor the modified contract, they aren’t going to risk it. They would have to have a lawyer or legal employee review it and analyze its costs and benefits to the company. That would cost a lot of money per each modified contract, so the company will simply ignore the changes and move on the the next customer.
“VANILLA IS A FLAVOR!”
-Tiger Wiger
Thank God!; for a second I thought it was cooked kiwi.
Classic torty. She makes you think she’s a grumpster…then she confirms she’s grumpy by swiping at your gentle caress and gurfing.
If you’re talking about the 2018 allegation. I don’t remember that allegation being considered “credible.”. If you have additional information since then, please link it for me and I will look at it.