- halcyoncmdr@piefed.socialEnglish8 days
In a just world, even asking for this would be a death sentence for a company.
MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldEnglish
7 days“We want this child safety bill to protect our corporation from children please” is such a good look
- Treczoks@lemmy.worldEnglish8 days
Mafia lobbies to get criminal law to be rewritten to remove punishments for crimes.
squeeG@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
8 daysI’m sure this is partially what these ID laws are about, they know their product is harmful to not just kids but EVERYONE, but they don’t want EVERYONE to stop using it, so what’s the answer? Ban the kids
- 8 days
Almost like they want to profit by harming kids.
squeeG@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
8 daysHow about just fix your god damn product so people won’t constantly sue you? Business nowadays is just completely asinine
- 8 days
At a certain size of a company, law suits are just the cost of doing business.
- 7 days
🧑⚖️: “But what if your best revenuing content creators are children?”
🤓: “That’s why I need you to rewrite it.”
👶🧒: “Wait… wat?!”

🤓: “Don’t worry. I’ll protect you guys.” mannycalavera@feddit.ukEnglish
8 daysWe are merely the vessel with which to produce harm.
Facefuck, 2026.
- skvlp@lemmy.wtfEnglish8 days
Almost as if the real goal is not protecting children, but surveillance.
- rynn@piefed.socialEnglish8 days
They want to get products in the hands of very young children to create customers for life.
This is the happy meal strategy on steroids.
- prole@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish7 days
Legislators: “and we just have to pass it guys, sorry. No choice in the meter. They propose it, we pass it for them. That’s how this all works”
Bristlecone@lemmy.worldEnglish
8 daysThey’ll get it too as long as they push it through before the midterms, maybe even after depending on what those look like
- melsaskca@lemmy.caEnglish8 days
Let’s just make brutal fucking murder and large theft legal already! /s









