New hollow-core fiber test pushes internet speeds to 1.2Tb/s

Okay let’s start with the simple case: You have a sender (laser source), a span of fiber of a certain length, and a receiver (photo diode). The three associated measurements would be transmission power, span loss, and receiving power.

Let’s say your laser is fairly strong in the context of optical networking and outputs 4 mW of power into our fiber span.

As the light travels through the medium (silica glass (SiO2)) it loses some power at every point, due to Brillouin scattering. Over distance the effect accumulates. How much you lose also depends on the qualities of the fiber, and on the quality of the splices where sections of fiber are connected (I’m told that while laying fiber they work with spools of 4 km of cable).

Now you could say something like, we have measured this cable, and after 12 km it loses half the laser power at 1550nm wavelength, that’s a realistic value. We would then have 2 mW of receiving power at the end of a 12 km span, or 0.125 mW after 60 km (halve the 4 mW five times).

But it’s hard to work with, and more so if you care about distances that don’t happen to be multiples of 12 km. So instead of multiplying absolute power levels with loss ratios all over the place, the industry has standardized on using a logarithmic scale. (Actually I’m pretty sure we inherited this from the telephone industry already, who had the same issue.)

Expressed in deciBel the 1/2 loss ratio from above becomes 10 * log10(1/2) ≈ -3 dB. Ten times for the deci, and the unit Bel is defined as the base-10 logarithm of the power ratio.

Now since it’s a log scale you can add up sections of fiber loss instead of multiplying them. If 12 km have a loss of -3 dB, then 24 km have -6 dB or 60 km have -15 dB. And if you want to calculate for arbitrary distances you might want to break it down to the kilometer, so -3 dB / 12 km = -0.25 dB / km. Now we can calculate what loss we would expect for 83 km, 83 km * -0.25 dB / km = -20.75 dB.

Okay great but how do we relate that to the transmission power of 4mW? Well we convert that into dBm. dBm stands for deziBel milliwatt. It expresses absolute power in a logarithmic scale, by essentially treating it as a ratio over a fixed reference value of 1 mW. So our 4mW turn into 10 * log10(4mW/1mW) ≈ 6 dBm.

Now you can add transmission power and span loss to get your receive power, which is super handy, just to prove it works I’ll do the 60 km case form above again: So 6 dBm sent over 60 km of fiber with a loss per kilometer of - 0.25 dB/km, or 60 km * -0.25 dB/km = - 15 dB, together gets us 6 dBm - 15 dB = -9 dBm, and convert back for proof (divide our value by ten for the deci, then take ten to the power of the intermediate to invert the logarithm) 10^(-9/10) ≈ 0.125 mW

So that’s how the scales and units work. I hope I could explain how It’s useful even if you only have one laser source. Of course it’s also useful if you have multiple sources, and other optical components, like filters and EDFAs in the mix, because you can specify them all in dB or dBm and just add and subtract as applicable.

For example you use 5 of those strong lasers of 6 dBm each, but you need a dynamic optical filter called WSS to combine them, which introduces an attenuation of 12 dB, but then you also add an EDFA that has a gain of 15 dB, followed by a fiber section of 30 dB loss, then another EDFA with a gain of 20 dB, then another WSS with 12 dB attenuation, and finally 5 receivers.

So you send into the fiber a total of 5 * 6 dBm - 12 dB + 15 dB = 33 dBm

Then at the end of the fiber you have 33 dBm - 30 dB = 3 dBm

After the EDFA and WSS you get a resulting power at each of your five receivers of (3 dBm + 20 dB - 12 dB) / 5 = 21 dBm / 5 = 4.2 dBm

As for this experiment, I haven’t heard more detail than what is found in this link. Maybe they will present it at ECOC 2026 :-)

But for now I know that the hollow core fiber section was 206.5 km long, and that they told us last year they had a real world deployment with 0.085 dB/km over 34 km. And that last year they had a record fiber (not weaved into a cable yet, which usually adds attenuation) of 0.050 dB/km, but it was relatively short, I think they only managed to make a spool of like 20 km or so. So maybe we can assume this new real world experiment achieved 0.080 dB/km over 206.5 km (longer is harder, of course), which would give us 16.52 dB span loss. But that’s just a pretty random estimate.

But the impressive bit is really the distance of 206.5 km without having to add any amplifiers anywhere in between. That is only achievable by sending light down the hollow core where it experiences less Brillouin scattering compared to in a classic silica glass core. And it needs to be well fabricated for all 206.5 km, with the fine silica glass details that make up the confinement structure in a hollow core fiber. It looks like very good engineering I would say. I’m just a user of fiber though. Even the fabrication of classical fiber sounds fiendishly difficult to me.

Just for contrast, if I had such a 206.5 km span to bridge in our network I would need to look for housing for an amplifier site, ideally somewhere between kilometer 90 and 116.5. Luckily Switzerland is dense in the populated areas, so this is usually not a big issue. I think our worst in-line amplifier site used to be in Rodi Fiesso, on the way up to the old Gotthard rail tunnel, but that one is history now.

Imagine how quickly they would load on this newfangled fiber.

Steam is the only service that actually maxes out my gigabit connection

I haven’t played call of duty in forever, are they still massive file sizes then.

I think you found the joke

For the same reason switching to fiber helped me shatter my Minesweeper top score

woosh

Can’t detect if serious.

Last time I needed a > 1TB dataset they sent it in the snail mail.

Same for me. Firefox with Ublock Origin, NoScript and Sponsor Block. Android phone with Revanced and SponsorBlock patch.

Hey thank you, pipe-pipe is excellent!

Or Invidious when you can’t/don’t want to install an additional app

Kinda forced when 99% of the world that uses internet is on that platform yk

I honestly don’t know what people here on Lemmy want them to do. If you don’t want ads then you can pay the subscription.

You can’t expect the largest video platform to be free and without ads, they have to pay to host all of the videos somehow.

If anyone has a serious alternative to ads or subscription while still being able to pay for the hosting then maybe start your own service and use that as the USP?

Damn, and I thought a station wagon full of tapes had a lot of bandwidth.

Which is funny considering that China is very capitalist

Yes I’ve seen something in that line of thinking as well. But even if China has schools that are not top notch, they have sent students to other countries to learn for about 50 years. And their own top schools are among the best in the world now.

https://www.topuniversities.com/world-university-rankings

#11 in Hong Kong and #13 in Peking.
IDK if the list is entirely fair, I imagine having a good and long track record could have an influence.
China has been investing heavily in research and education, several times more than what we do in Europe and USA.
So it’s no wonder they are catching up, and even passing us now.

Funny to see how we both got a downvote? 😋🤣
Maybe someone still believing in the superiority of the west, which clearly we don’t have a monopoly on anymore, China has caught up, exactly as Japan and Korea have done before China.